I would give some suggestions for the second edition of your book. "The climate - how to avoid a disaster".

To Mr. Bill Gates

Personally, I am extremely pessimistic about the future of humanity on earth.

I agree with the indications indicated in your book "The climate - how to avoid a disaster".

I would give some suggestions for the second edition of your book.

1. As a first chapter can be important to make precise predictions about the results of the catastrophe

climatic, indicating by name the submerged areas, the areas incapacitated for the

too hot, the movements of populations to and from where...

This will perhaps create panic, but perhaps it is precisely the panic that can be

the manner for the population to wake up.

2. The man factor:

You may have wondered why from the first civilizations to today man

he never stopped waging wars.

Technical evolution has not influenced man's actions.

Numerous scientists have shown that in some men there are particularities

of the brain that make them have no feeling of compassion towards the

rest of humanity and can be at the origin of endless holocausts and wars.

Hitler an example for all.

We must also invest billions in identifying these men through DNA verification.

Whoever has this “malformation of the DNA (and therefore of the brain) must be excluded from any position of power and, if possible, treated.

In the states where these men rule and dominate how can they be applied your indications for climate change?

Implementation implies existenceof a feeling of "compassion" that these men do not have.

3. The land is an overcrowded "boat"; policies that tend to be set in motion

the maintenance of the population without increases (the education of women is fundamental in the poorest countries at high birth rates.)

4. In a land "limited by its size" it is impossible to continue with politics of the increase in gross domestic product.

5. The population that compulsorily, due to poverty 'or voluntarily for the choice of a non-consumerist life causes less or no emissions of anhydride

carbon dioxide must be paid by the carbon-intensive population.

This will also serve to reduce poverty.

We can create different ranges of "level of consumption and emission of carbon dioxide" and we can penialize the people with higher consumption in favor of those with low consumption and low carbon dioxide emissions.

If I don't have a car, I don't have conditioner air, I dont eat meat,. .. I must have to pay a small monthly fee.

6. Nuclear power plants are probably a decisive answer; it is possible to reduce the risk? Can't nuclear waste be shipped to the nearest planet?

We must have the courage to think "different" to save humanity from catastrophe imminent.

Thanks for everything you are doing.

Sincerely

Dr. Paolo da Fano (Italy)